Original author of 3d model: FM3
Author of engine, transmission and other details: METALman
Author of convertion: METALman
- High Quality 3D model
- Full 3D engine and transmission
- There are 1 extra
- Painted rims [CLR:2] Replaces: Virgo
Downloads: 3,830
Added: August 27, 2011 3:17PM
Last Downloaded: May 21, 2013 3:05PM File Size: 5.35 MB
» Author Website
Author of engine, transmission and other details: METALman
Author of convertion: METALman
- High Quality 3D model
- Full 3D engine and transmission
- There are 1 extra
- Painted rims [CLR:2] Replaces: Virgo
| Rating: |  
|
| 8.04/10 - 48 votes |
Added: August 27, 2011 3:17PM
Last Downloaded: May 21, 2013 3:05PM File Size: 5.35 MB
» Author Website
10/10
ugly cars would be
american "Gas" guzzlers
I'm definitely gonna try it when I start modding again :P
this is classic....not ugly....you son of a bitch....if some others made a 1983 BMW 320i...M-Benz 280TE or Porsche 928S....you still gonna say those are just some ugly square shaped machine...I can sure you are a fuckin' ugly square shaped machine...just fuck off...you dont belong here
I rather doubt you're the one to fuck off. I know this is classic, but it can't hide the fact that it's ugly does it?We're living in the 21st century, at least expect yourself driving a new designed car for God sake. If this in Vice City, I would've approved it but in IV you must be joking me :D
I rather driving a '67 GT500 more than a new designed car. Everyone have their own passion on cars...your thinking doesnt mean everything and we all dont think this car is ugly....This is 21st century...but it doesnt mean we cant drive old fashion cars...beside..they are still awesome rides..I dont say new car is shit...but anyway, all the new cars are come from all these "ugly square shaped machine" that you still thinking right now...this car is suitable for IV or not, I say yes...and other say yes...and you...just a little thing that say no...so pls...just GTFO of here...you really dont belong here...again
see http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3Nq7CKYaRdQ/TKTzOeBH4HI/AAAAAAAAVB0/OH_iySy-zC8/s1600/2011+Audi+quattro+concept2.jpg
http://gta-unlimited.ru/
^That's the site this, and many other cars, come from.
This car may be an ugly square shaped machine,but that is actually part of its character and its appeal,cars are not allways about just the looks you know! Besides i would pit this car up against just about any modern Audi,BMW,Mercedes or japanese cars,and most likely win,this car is the grandfather of all AWD cars you see on the road today. 0-60mph in 4.5 seconds!! Most cars being built today still cant achieve times like this car could in 1983. watch this video..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4K2BpXuEeE
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3127357/1965-plymouth-barracuda
have you looking at yourself in the mirror lately? That is the meaning of ugly, this audi is not. Its always good to have some older cars especially something as iconic as this.
Dr. Toker,
sorry to break it to you but this car wouldn't be able to outhandle most new cars with 0 to 60 times in the 6 second range. Its 4wd system isn't as advanced as it used to be and its suspension isn't as firm as sport cars today, not only that but its also a lot harder to control at the limit. It wont match the grip of today's newer cars but its still fast. Btw its 0 to 60 time is 4.8 and it does that with only 306 hp a 300 hp 350z = 5.2 so its still amazing :).
First off,i hate to break it to you.. but i never said it would "out handle" anything,even though you would be seriously wrong if you really believe it couldn't out handle a car in the 6 second range,lmao..but,whatever you say man!
Second,watch the video i provided before,which you clearly ignored..as this video was the source of my information,and it clearly states a 0-60mph time of 4 1/2 (4.5) seconds!!! And before you make claims about how this car handles against more modern cars,AGAIN,you should watch the video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4K2BpXuEeE
I did and if you have ever watched these kinda shows they don't produce those times themselves and if you look at most sources that provide the specs of this model they show 4.8 and they actually tested it. Also that video is old and the car the audi was compared with is old and it beat the audi didn't it? And i am sorry to break it to you any modern most modern cars will easily destroy the audi cause its just really old and out of date. Most new BMWs, Audis, Mercedes, and just about any other mark will leave it in the dust maybe the audi will go 0 to 60 faster then some but you just cant compare a 1980s car against new ones cause its like i said before old and out off date and slow compared to them. Its true if you ever looked at lap times of cars from 10 years ago and look at cars that have the same acceleration times the new ones will win, now think of how big of a difference it will be if you compare that audi against a evolution 10... btw that audi is one of my favorite cars and i dont mean to make it look bad or anything but im just stating facts. Its time passed and back then it was a badass.
And im confused,by testing..don't you mean what they were doing in the video? Cause,you know..im not so sure they have enough of these to pass around for every website on the net that lists it's specs to actually test it. These are VERY rare cars!
I am not defending GM either,they are my least favorite American car company,but to be fair..they are'nt the only company that puts out cars with low gas mileage :)